(Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu)(2) BINTI ANISAUL KHASANAH
(Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractThis community service activity aimed to improve junior high school teachers’ competence in scientific writing. The background of this program was the low percentage of teachers who had experience in writing scientific papers, where only 30% had previously written academic work. The training involved 30 teachers from SMP Negeri 2 Pringsewu and was conducted through theoretical sessions, practical workshops, mentoring, and evaluation stages. Data were collected using pre-test and post-test instruments, observation, and participant feedback questionnaires. The results showed a significant improvement in participants’ understanding and writing skills, with an average increase of 40%. In addition, 83% of participants successfully completed draft scientific papers that met academic standards. The activity also increased teachers’ motivation to write, as indicated by 90% positive responses in the evaluation questionnaire. Therefore, scientific writing training combined with mentoring proved effective in strengthening teachers’ professional competence and promoting a culture of academic writing in schools.
|
Article metricsAbstract views : 15 | PDF views : 17 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
A. Wibowo, Menulis karya ilmiah: Artikel, skripsi, tesis, dan disertasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
Supardi, Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2013.
S. Arikunto, Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.
Depdiknas, Panduan penulisan karya ilmiah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, 2008.
Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
L. M. Desimone and K. Pak, “Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947.
M. A. Kraft, D. Blazar, and D. Hogan, “The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 547–588, 2018, doi: 10.3102/0034654318759268.
J. Gore, A. Lloyd, M. Smith, J. Bowe, H. Ellis, and D. Lubans, “Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 67, pp. 1–13, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.010.
M. R. Heydari, F. Taghva, M. Amini, and S. Delavari, “Using Kirkpatrick’s model to measure the effect of a new teaching and learning methods workshop for health care staff,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 12, art. no. 388, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4421-y.
K. M. Mitchell et al., “Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES),” Assessing Writing, vol. 48, art. no. 100524, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524.
M. von Isenburg, L. S. Lee, and M. H. Oermann, “Writing together to get AHEAD: An interprofessional boot camp to support scholarly writing in the health professions,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2017, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.222.